A variety of social vulnerability factors have been associated with physically inactive lifestyles. For instance, it has been shown that the probability of meeting physical activity recommendations increases with the level of education and household income, and decreases in Australian adults with remoteness and area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Data from many developing countries has shown that higher socio-economic status is positively correlated with adult leisure time or moderate activity. Some evidence demonstrates that children adults with a disability are at increased risk of physical inactivity although this is not unequivocal. For example, in Australia, in 2010, 68% of adults with a disability reported participating in sport or physical recreation activities, lower than the 79% of people without a disability,

A graded positive relationship between women’s education level and the probability of participating in both leisure-time walking, and walking for transport on the other hand, and found that occupants of disadvantaged neighborhoods walked more for transport than those from more prosperous neighborhoods. These mixed discoveries may be due to differing local contexts or urban designs across localities, since transport-related physical activity is strongly liked to urban features, including street connectivity and contiguity to facilities, and such features are related to neighborhood disadvantage in complex ways across locations.

The distribution of sedentary habits in society:
These are a category of activities characterized by low energy consumption, such as sitting, driving, watching TV, and other screen behaviors, such as watching DVDs, computer games or playing video, or browsing the internet While the health risks associated with sedentary behavior are comparable to those associated with lack of physical activity (e.g. increased risk, they have been shown to be indexed.

Regular living environments as physical activity determinants and sedentary behaviors:

Regular living conditions also affect engagement in sedentary behavior and physical activity at the next stage of the system, influenced by these wider influences within the socio-economic, political and cultural contexts. Primary determinants of physical activity at this level include social encouragement from family, colleagues, peers or health professionals for activities; and access to opportunities for physical activity within colleges, workplaces, and other key settings in which individuals reside A major obstacle to physical activity engagement is also the lack of funding or motivation for healthy lifestyles. Conditions to which people are subjected play a vital role in affecting variables at the individual level that are determinants of physical activity. These include inspiration, self-efficacy, challenges perceived (such as the cost of lack of time) and history and skills of physical activity. All of these individual-level variables are likely to play a part in describing social differences in sedentary behaviors and physical activity. The reasons for the absence of regularly identified social differences in childhood physical activity are not well known, but education could well play a role.

A variety of social vulnerability factors have been associated with physically inactive lifestyles. For instance, it has been shown that the probability of meeting physical activity recommendations increases with the level of education and household income, and decreases in Australian adults with remoteness and area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Data from many developing countries has shown that higher socio-economic status is positively correlated with adult leisure time or moderate activity. Some evidence demonstrates that children adults with a disability are at increased risk of physical inactivity although this is not unequivocal. For example, in Australia, in 2010, 68% of adults with a disability reported participating in sport or physical recreation activities, lower than the 79% of people without a disability,

A graded positive relationship between women’s education level and the probability of participating in both leisure-time walking, and walking for transport on the other hand, and found that occupants of disadvantaged neighborhoods walked more for transport than those from more prosperous neighborhoods. These mixed discoveries may be due to differing local contexts or urban designs across localities, since transport-related physical activity is strongly liked to urban features, including street connectivity and contiguity to facilities, and such features are related to neighborhood disadvantage in complex ways across locations.

The distribution of sedentary habits in society:
These are a category of activities characterized by low energy consumption, such as sitting, driving, watching TV, and other screen behaviors, such as watching DVDs, computer games or playing video, or browsing the internet While the health risks associated with sedentary behavior are comparable to those associated with lack of physical activity (e.g. increased risk, they have been shown to be indexed.

Regular living environments as physical activity determinants and sedentary behaviors:

Regular living conditions also affect engagement in sedentary behavior and physical activity at the next stage of the system, influenced by these wider influences within the socio-economic, political and cultural contexts. Primary determinants of physical activity at this level include social encouragement from family, colleagues, peers or health professionals for activities; and access to opportunities for physical activity within colleges, workplaces, and other key settings in which individuals reside A major obstacle to physical activity engagement is also the lack of funding or motivation for healthy lifestyles. Conditions to which people are subjected play a vital role in affecting variables at the individual level that are determinants of physical activity. These include inspiration, self-efficacy, challenges perceived (such as the cost of lack of time) and history and skills of physical activity. All of these individual-level variables are likely to play a part in describing social differences in sedentary behaviors and physical activity. The reasons for the absence of regularly identified social differences in childhood physical activity are not well known, but education could well play a role.

Steps to improve physical activity:
● Build environmental designs for communities to encourage healthy living

● Establish or boost access to places for physical activity in combination with outreach activities

● Providing community environments with socially support unities and interventions

● Physical education for children at school

● Shift in personally tailored actions.

A variety of social vulnerability factors have been associated with physically inactive lifestyles. For instance, it has been shown that the probability of meeting physical activity recommendations increases with the level of education and household income, and decreases in Australian adults with remoteness and area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Data from many developing countries has shown that higher socio-economic status is positively correlated with adult leisure time or moderate activity. Some evidence demonstrates that children adults with a disability are at increased risk of physical inactivity although this is not unequivocal. For example, in Australia, in 2010, 68% of adults with a disability reported participating in sport or physical recreation activities, lower than the 79% of people without a disability,

A graded positive relationship between women’s education level and the probability of participating in both leisure-time walking, and walking for transport on the other hand, and found that occupants of disadvantaged neighborhoods walked more for transport than those from more prosperous neighborhoods. These mixed discoveries may be due to differing local contexts or urban designs across localities, since transport-related physical activity is strongly liked to urban features, including street connectivity and contiguity to facilities, and such features are related to neighborhood disadvantage in complex ways across locations.

The distribution of sedentary habits in society:
These are a category of activities characterized by low energy consumption, such as sitting, driving, watching TV, and other screen behaviors, such as watching DVDs, computer games or playing video, or browsing the internet While the health risks associated with sedentary behavior are comparable to those associated with lack of physical activity (e.g. increased risk, they have been shown to be indexed.

Regular living environments as physical activity determinants and sedentary behaviors:

Regular living conditions also affect engagement in sedentary behavior and physical activity at the next stage of the system, influenced by these wider influences within the socio-economic, political and cultural contexts. Primary determinants of physical activity at this level include social encouragement from family, colleagues, peers or health professionals for activities; and access to opportunities for physical activity within colleges, workplaces, and other key settings in which individuals reside A major obstacle to physical activity engagement is also the lack of funding or motivation for healthy lifestyles. Conditions to which people are subjected play a vital role in affecting variables at the individual level that are determinants of physical activity. These include inspiration, self-efficacy, challenges perceived (such as the cost of lack of time) and history and skills of physical activity. All of these individual-level variables are likely to play a part in describing social differences in sedentary behaviors and physical activity. The reasons for the absence of regularly identified social differences in childhood physical activity are not well known, but education could well play a role.

Steps to improve physical activity:
● Build environmental designs for communities to encourage healthy living

● Establish or boost access to places for physical activity in combination with outreach activities

● Providing community environments with socially support unities and interventions

● Physical education for children at school

● Shift in personally tailored actions.